I received this article about ten
days ago and was about to post it up this time last week when news came through
of Sean O'Driscoll's sacking. It didn't seem like the right time.
However, having got through the weekend and the immense volume of tweets,
forum posts and Facebook comments on Steve Cotterill's appointment, I've
finally got around to re-reading it and thought, you know what, it's no less
relevant now, so let's post it up for people to read.
So here you go - it's from Matt
Franklin and I'm sure will resonate with more than a few other fans. What
Cotterill decides to do with the team set-up will be interesting to say the
least, and perhaps Matt may just get his wish.
“There
may be no more exciting a goal than when a winger, who is hugging the
touchline, receives a long diagonal ball from a midfielder, beats his full back
on the outside, then whips in a fast paced cross for a striker to bullet head
home.
You
know the goal. The one where Brian Tinnion sprays it out to Scott Murray on the
right wing. This type of goal has become rarer throughout the world, let alone
at Ashton Gate.
So
where have the wingers gone? Where are the Stuart Ripley’s and Jason Wilcox’s?
Where are the Franz Carr’s and Ian Woan’s? How many times do you see on Match
Of The Day teams set up in a 4-2-3-1or 4-3-3 formation without one natural
winger? And since when did the possession statistic become more important than
the corner count?
I
read an interesting report from the Harvard University by Jan Vecer on the
negative impact on scoring that crossing has. After analysing an entire
season in England’s and Germany’s top division, he declares “Crossing from an open play is hugely inefficient,
only 1 open cross in 4.87 is an accurate cross, and only 1 open cross out of
91.47 leads to a goal on average”. In the
opening chapter of the absorbing book ‘The Numbers Game’ by Chris Anderson and David Sally, crosses
from corners are dissected from all over Europe, with a damming conclusion -“Corners are next to
worthless; given the risk of being caught on the counterattack, with your
central defenders marooned in the opposition’s box, their value in terms of net
goal difference is close to zero.”
And in Rafa Benitez’s pre-season blog ‘Where are the wingers?’ the Spaniard explains “The classic quick and tricky winger used to come up
against defenders who were less prepared than the modern defenders. Nowadays,
the physical, technical and tactical preparation is much more comprehensive”.
Of course conclusions from
these far from imply that the classic wing play of dribbling and ‘getting it in
the mixer’ will quickly become a thing of the past but it does highlight how
football has changed.
Even
though Scott Wagstaff and Joe Bryan have given us some of our more entertaining
passages of play this season (The Bristol Derby and Carlisle immediately spring
to mind), there is still a general consensus that our team lacks width.
However, while four midfielders that favour central positions lined up a couple
of weeks ago at Prenton Park in the 1-1 draw at Tranmere - it was Brendon
Moloney and Greg Cunningham getting up and down the flanks from their full back
position, both getting to the by-line regularly, providing plenty of attacking
threat.
If
your midfield have the quality to keep possession, and your full backs have
pace and the ability to get forward well, a narrow quartet in the middle of the
park can overload the oppositions. On the flip side, long and frequent diagonal
balls is a way of cutting down the amount of times attacking full backs will
get forward - A tactic that Sean O’Driscoll implemented at times to suit a
particular situation, not because he had run out of ideas.
I
think the aerial game has changed things too. The majority of successful teams
nowadays want to keep the ball on the floor with the emphasise on fluidity and
keeping possession - this way of playing could isolate an out and out winger of
old; and because a lot of width now comes from the full backs, the wider
midfielders have more of a role defensively anyway.
But
it is not just the lack of wingers that has changed attacking play. We have
seen a lot of teams set up with just one centre forward, often due to most
teams setting up in less rigid formations like they did, with a clear objective
of dominating defensive and midfield areas. Attacking players have to be more
versatile these days; no disrespect to these guys but it would be interesting
to see title winning centre forwards such as Alan Smith and Lee Chapman in
today’s modern game, where there is an ever increasing importance on a forwards
movement.”
Whether or not Cotterill 're-introduces' wingers or not remains to be seen. What is clear is that Moloney and Cunningham offered good advanced width against Leyton Orient and it seemed to make a difference, perhaps creating additional space for Sam Baldock in the middle to have more of an impact than he often has done?
Will Cotterill provide the flair and excitement Matt was after, or will the situation we're in drive a more pragamatic, tighter approach to the middle of the pitch. Results may come with one method, but there's no doubt the majority of fans would love to see two nippy widemen bombing down the flanks...
My thanks to Matt - as it's his debut on the site please let him know what you think!
The Exiled Robin
Follow me on Twitter ---'Like' me on Facebook
http://exiledrobin.blogspot.com
www.facebook.com/theciderdiaries --- www.twitter.com/theciderdiaries
www.facebook.com/theciderdiaries --- www.twitter.com/theciderdiaries
an interesting piece, I've noticed that full backs are becoming better and better at wing play
ReplyDelete