Take yourself back six
years. For six years ago next weekend,
Ashton Gate was packed to the rafters on a sunny day with gloriously happy
Bristol City fans, with red shirts aplenty on display in the May sunshine. Rotherham had turned up for an end-of-season
game with fewer than 100 fans so almost every inch of the ground was full of
noisy, happy City fans. Gary Johnson had
finally got us promoted and had done so in style. BS3 was a very happy place to be.
Now ask yourselves a question,
but before you do just remember the calamity that followed our previous
promotion; John Ward’s sacking, Benny Lennartsson’s singularly disastrous reign,
expensive signings no-one had ever heard of, Chairman Scott Davidson posting
his team selections under the dressing room doors.….
If someone, right at that moment
just over half a decade ago, had offered you six unbroken seasons in the
Championship, one year escaping relegation, one solid fifteenth place, two
tenth-placed finishes and a play-off final – the very brink of the Premier
League – at Wembley included, what would you have replied?
Play-off success: too much, too soon?
If someone had said you’ll have
trips to St. James’ Park, Upton Park and Elland Road, Molineux, Ewood Park and
Hillsborough, that you’ll sign a young defender who will go on to play for
England and a winger who’ll star for Ghana, I reckon most would have snapped
the offer up without a moment’s hesitation?
Indeed, if you’d been offered
just that one infamous night against Crystal Palace – that moment when Lee
Trundle’s shot hit the back of the net, or when Michael McIndoe’s free kick
sailed past Julian Speroni, many might have taken it right there and then.
Because that all sounds pretty
good, right?
Shouldn’t we be going down thinking
“Ah well, it’s disappointing but we’ve
had a good run, now let’s get back up and do it all again”? After all, we remain one of the smaller
clubs in the division, with attendances hovering in the bottom third.
But, no. It's depressing, it's frustrating and it's bewildering.
The problem at City is that we’ve
had all that, but it’s been the ‘wrong’ way around. Instead of building slowly, gradually
implementing a higher class of player into a confident and successful squad,
and incrementally building the club into an established Championship performer,
we had it too good too early and everyone got greedy.
Steve Lansdown did, and has spent
£40m of his own fortune paying for the debilitating dream. The players did, early on at least. We, the fans, certainly did.
Even this season, a season that
has ended in despair and mass disgruntlement, began with talk of a play-off
push. Indeed, after three matches, some
of the more emotionally-extreme fans were talking about a challenge for the
title. I remember corresponding with
some on Twitter who couldn’t understand why Nicky Maynard had joined Cardiff
after we’d thrashed them during our bright start to the season, and became personally
irate when I suggested Cardiff would finish well above us. Short-termism is the cause of many a row in
this interactive and immediate world.
The signings of Sam Baldock,
Steven Davies, Tom Heaton, Greg Cunningham and Paul Anderson all looked to be
of good quality, and there was still time to sign that centre-back, an Andre
Bikey, or another Stephen Caulker, before the transfer window, or even the loan
window, was closed.
But that man never came.
Last season’s end-of-season review went over many points that
won’t be repeated here, but ultimately the club has had a long, slow and
drawn-out decline, leading ultimately to relegation in the most subdued and
depressing manner. Three years of staid,
poor quality and long-ball football (barring the first few months of this
season when we scored goals for fun but let in even more!) have left its mark
on the club and its supporters.
And just when you thought it
couldn’t get any worse, the already relegated side come up with a pitiful display,
surely worse than any that had preceded.
Personally, I can never remember being so tempted to leave a game with
half-an-hour to go as I was during the Huddersfield game. Rarely can there have been a performance so
devoid of…well, anything. No pride, no
passion and seemingly no care for the club or the fans who had turned up. To a man the Terriers were faster and more
alert, quicker to every ball and stronger in every challenge. Only Jon Stead’s introduction late on seemed
to galvanise a marginally better approach, but by then Huddersfield were
already celebrating survival. Fans,
ready to applaud the players despite having already been let down so badly by
finishing many points adrift at the bottom, left in droves and the poorly
titled ‘lap of honour’ must have been hastily brushed under the carpet with
fewer fans remaining than would turn up for one of the under-21’s games.
It summed up our season in a
nutshell. Goals came from all angles,
but especially straight down the middle of the pitch. Right through the core of the team in a manner
of a training exercise, without a tackle or challenge worthy of the name, in an
all too similar way to at least a dozen others since August.
The two key elements for me
remain as they were one year ago, when I suggested City must improve the
balance of the squad and rid the club of the soft core.
To be fair to Derek McInnes, and
few are these days, he did a lot to resolve point one. I’ll come back to the commanding centre-half
issue, but we came out of last season in desperate need for additional
firepower, a left-back we’d required for three years, and a solid goalkeeper to
replace David James.
In Baldock, Davies, Cunningham
and Heaton, McInnes signed four good quality Championship players who have all
played their part in the more positive parts of the season and, subject to wage
expectations, most would like to see remain with the club to challenge for
promotion next time around.
The yearning for two top-quality
strikers (who it must be said don’t compliment each other at all well) was
brought into sharp focus by owner Steve Lansdown this week, who squarely laid blame at McInnes’ door by suggesting his insistence in pursuing both front men left
little spare change for the centre-half role that has proven so critical.
I’m hardly providing a Gary
Neville-esque moment of footballing insight when suggesting the lack of a big,
strong and forceful centre-half has been the most important aspect of our
dismal season. Both Lansdowns,
O’Driscoll and almost every supporter knows it.
Even the Evening Post has pointed it out, which only underlines the
bewildering lack of any solution.
However, the robustness and
solidity apparent during our one good run of the season, and again at Hull last
Friday, showed me that Fontaine, Nyatanga & Carey could have adequately
filled the second spot, but none have it in them to be the main man (any more,
in Carey’s case it should be noted). Yes
Fontaine has had a dreadful season and made some horrendous mistakes, but he
had no-one to turn to for help, and when his confidence was shot to pieces we
had so few options that we couldn’t rest him and take him out of the firing
line.
Equally in midfield, the likes of
Skuse, Elliott and Pearson have their critics, but when paired with a quality
‘breaker-up’ of play – the likes of Kalifa Cisse for instance – or a creative
spark, it might have been adequate enough.
Indeed it seems as if Skuse in particular might remain in the Championship
whilst the rest of us sink and travel to Shrewsbury and Rotherham. Five consecutive managers have picked Skuse
and Elliott regularly in the Championship, so they can’t be that bad, can they? But again, as with the back line, we didn’t
find that strong, spine-moulding, high quality individual.
Up-front Davies and Baldock
provide plenty of skill and Championship ability, but neither can provide the
fulcrum at the head of the spine. Stead
can, and it’s no coincidence the better performances appear to have again come
when he was leading the line, but the likelihood of him dropping to League One
seems slim.
If nothing else, three players
are needed. Strong, leaders of men, each willing to run until they drop and crash
through brick walls in the desire for success.
Players able to control the middle of the pitch and let the ‘softer’,
arguably more talented, players work around them.
On reflection, three games shaped
the season. It seems like a lifetime ago
but the 5-3 home defeat to Blackburn seemed to rattle McInnes’ faith in the gung-ho
attacking approach that had brought comprehensive wins against Champions-elect
Cardiff and play-off contenders Crystal Palace.
The approach was toned down, formation and line-up altered incessantly
and things were never the same for the Scotsman again.
I’m sure I wasn’t the only one to
think, whilst sitting and watching the goals flying in, that the style of
defeat against Leicester was the sort to get managers the sack. Had you told me at 2pm that McInnes would be
out four hours later I wouldn’t have believed you. By 5:30 it barely registered a tremor of
surprise.
Most significantly there was the
ultimately pivotal game at Wolves, who look likely to be joining us
beneath the halfway marker in the league next time around. Two months of Sean O’Driscoll’s influence had
provided a potentially season-saving upturn in fortunes that were being
rubber-stamped with a 1-0 half-time lead.
The final twenty minutes were weak enough to allow that lead to
disappear, and from potentially being clear of the relegation zone, City were
plunged right back into trouble and they never recovered. Following a run which had yielded 17 valuable
points from just ten matches, the blow of losing that lead led to the subsequent
eight matches producing just a pair of draws and the end result of the season
was thus defined.
If you want an at-a-glance view
on things, the Player of the Year award has, for the second consecutive season,
told you everything you need to know about Bristol City’s season. Whereas last season Stead picked up the award
despite barely appearing until February, this season the official awards
weren’t even given out and the Disabled Supporters selected Heaton for their
prize, a goalkeeper who didn’t keep a clean sheet for the first 32
(thirty-two!) matches of the campaign and has shipped the vast majority of a whopping 80 goals to
date, with 90 highly-unanticipated minutes still remaining. It’s fair to say those in front are
considered the major weakness rather than the impressive ex-Manchester United
and Cardiff stopper, who has resisted valiantly when given half a chance.
Heaton has been the best
performer, despite conceding nearly 80 goals
I’m not going to bang on about
formations here but I can’t leave the ‘what went wrong’ section without
touching on it. One issue our fans – and
fans of many other clubs – must get over is that to be successful we will not
be able to play 4-4-2 with two flying wingers.
Football has changed and the midfield become ever more stifled. The best teams in the world generally play
three in the middle of the park, be it via a 4-5-1 or a 4-3-3 fluid
set-up. Unless you have two excellent
fullbacks and two highly complimentary central midfielders, able to gnarl and
graft as well as prod and poke forward, 4-4-2 just simply doesn’t work any
more. We might, might just get away with it in League One if we sign
well and improve our attitude, but once we go back up we’ll get taken apart by
most sides if we try to play as teams did in the 1980’s.
As the song goes, whatever will
be will be (and we are indeed going to Shrewsbury), and there’s no point mulling over
who’s to blame. There is no one
person. Yes you can criticise Steve
Lansdown for poor managerial appointments but he’s also appointed Gary Johnson
and Sean O’Driscoll, not to mention bank-rolling the club to such an extent
that ensures the Portsmouth path – thankfully – won’t be followed.
McInnes, Keith Millen, Johnson himself
– have all certainly played a part in the demise, but each had their own
restrictions and influences and each had some positives emerge from their
reigns.
Stead, Brett Pitman, Heaton,
Cunningham, Baldock, Davies, Caulker, Bikey and Anderson are amongst the
signings they made that would form a very decent side indeed, whilst
performances such as home to Southampton and Cardiff (x2) spring to mind when
considering the better days enjoyed.
And how much can you lay blame at
the fans door? Have we asked too much?
Have we supported the club as others do? Have we been too quick to
criticise managers, players, Board members – anyone associated with the club? It’s essential the whole club pulls together
and drives towards one aim, or we’ve no hope of succeeding.
The timing of Gary Johnson’s
departure has been previously agreed with on these pages but Wolves look to be
the latest example of fans needing to be careful what they wish for when they
decide the main man has “taken us as far as he can”. I wonder if they would be fronting up to a
season in League One if Mick McCarthy were still in charge?
Whoever’s fault it may be, it’s a
futile exercise trying to explore it.
For the first time I can remember
I’m not particularly bothered about keeping many members of the squad. Heaton would be a great signature, whilst
Cunningham and Moloney seem solid enough at full-back. Most would surely agree
they’d love Stead to re-sign but that seems highly unlikely. I’m sure few would begrudge Carey another
year on lower wages, whilst Anderson and Kelly have a lot to prove but are
likely to remain.
Adomah will probably leave, whilst
Baldock and Davies will undoubtedly have their suitors. Yes they’d all do a job at the lower level
but if, say, £2-£3m could be raised by selling, along with the weekly wage budget
freed up sufficiently, then the promise of a completely fresh team and approach
could outweigh their natural benefits.
Skuse, Elliott, Nyatanga,
Fontaine, Pearson – a whole string of names that, again, could probably do a good
job in League One but how many would be taking to the forum pages to complain
if they were moved on?
Foster, Kilkenny, Mark and James Wilson,
Gerken and Bates could be shipped out in the dark of the night without many noticing.
Some will say relegation is a
blessing in disguise, that it’s not necessarily a bad thing. Perhaps they are the same people who also said that it wouldn’t have done us
any good beating Hull in the play-off final and getting to the Premier League too early?
Whilst the sentiment is
understood, to consider not playing at the highest possible level seems an
oddity that doesn’t make sense. Gillingham
and Oldham or Leeds and Nottingham Forest?
Three or four games on Sky or one if you’re lucky? Crowds of 30,000 or 3,000? F.A. Cup Round Three or Round One?
Last time we went down we were
favourites to go straight back up. It
took eight years to recover.
For those that didn’t go through it, eight years
is an awfully, awfully long time.
The Exiled Robin
Good Article
ReplyDeletebut as (surrogate) chairman Steve lansdown surely could have vetoed Mcinnes on decisions - ultimately he does hold the purse strings so if he could see this problem, why did he let it develop? are we honestly believing that he hands over a big pot of money to the manager and says go ahead, spend as you like? thats rather poor judgement if so, if not, he's avoiding the responsibility.
ReplyDeletelaying the blame at the door of the man you've appointed to work under your direction is weak - 'judge me on Tinnion' aah yes, that one too?
Mr lansdown has positioned this club exactly where he wanted it to be - his (mis)fortune means that expectancy is high and he seems to waiver between funding big signings, and effectively bloating our wage structure in doing so - James, was a classic example - and pulling in his horns suddenley when it all starts going pear shaped.
The FFP rules are a good reason to rein it all back - lets see how it all balances out after that.